Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Genesis vs. Genetics

When I saw this photo of ‘corn’ produced by way of genetic engineering, the following Bible verse flashed through my mind.

In Leviticus 19:19, the Creator God says to the Israelites,  

“Keep my decrees. Do not mate different kinds of animals. Do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.

Question: "How should a Christian view genetic engineering?"

Answer: Because genetic engineering was unknown at the time that the Bible was written, it is difficult to establish definitive references on that topic alone. In order to determine the Christian view of genetic engineering, we need to establish a grid of principles through which to view genetic engineering. For specifics on the Christian view of cloning please see “What is the Christian view of cloning?

The element of greatest concern about the issue of genetic engineering involves how much liberty mankind can take in its responsibility to care for the human body and the rest of creation. There is no doubt that the Bible exhorts us to be responsible for our physical health. Proverbs refers to certain activities regarding restoring the health of an individual (Proverbs 12:18). The Apostle Paul states that we have a certain duty to care for the body (Ephesians 5:29). He also encouraged his protégé, Timothy, to take medicinal action for his infirmities (1 Timothy 5:23). We are also aware that believers have the distinct responsibility of responding properly with the body in that it is the temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19, 20). We are to show our faith by offering assistance to those who have physical needs (James 2:16). Therefore, we can conclude that as Christians we should be concerned about physical well-being and the benefits of securing help with our health.

Second, the creation was to be under the care of humans (Genesis 1:28; 2:15-20), but the Bible tells us that creation was impacted by the sin of humans (Genesis 3:17-19, Romans 8:19-21) and anticipates being redeemed from its effects. It is possible to conclude that as caretakers for the creation, humans have an obligation to “fix” the effects of the sin curse and attempt to bring things into a better alignment, using any means possible. Therefore, the thinking goes, scientific advances could be used for the betterment of the creation. However, there are concerns regarding employing genetic engineering to accomplish this good.

1. There is the concern that genetic engineering will take on a role beyond what God has given to us as His creation.

The Bible states that all things were created by God and for Him (Colossians 1:16). As individuals we are made in God’s image and therefore should be subject to His plan (Genesis 1:26, 27; Matthew 22:20, 21). God designed all living things after certain “kinds” (Genesis 1:11-25). Too much manipulation of the genetics (altering species) could be delving into issues reserved for the Designer.

2. There is the concern of genetic engineering attempting to preclude God’s plan for the restoration of creation.

As stated above, the creation was affected by the events recorded in Genesis 3 (mankind’s rebellion against God’s plan). Death entered into the world, and man’s genetic make-up and that of the rest of creation began a change toward demise. In some instances, genetic engineering could be seen as an attempt to undo this result called the “curse.” However, God has said that He has a remedy for this—redemption through Jesus Christ, as described in Romans 8 and 1 Corinthians 15. The creation anticipates newness associated with the culmination of God’s promise to restore things to an even better state than the original. To go “too far” to fight this process may compete with the responsibility of individuals to trust in Christ for restoration (Philippians 3:21).

3. It seems evident from general scriptural study that God has a plan for the process of life which  is unique and purposeful.

There is concern that if humanity interferes with that process, something could go terribly wrong. For example, Psalm 139 describes an intimate relationship between the psalmist and his Creator from the womb. Would the use of genetic manipulation to create life outside of God’s plan jeopardize the development of a God-conscious soul? Would interfering with the process of physical life affect the prospects of spiritual life? Romans 5:12 tells us that all humanity sins because Adam sinned. It is understood that this involved the transference of the sin nature from generation to generation so that all have sinned (Romans 3:23). Paul explains the hope of eternity through the conquering of Adam’s sin. If all that are in Adam (from his seed) die, and Christ died for those in such condition, could life created outside of that “seed” be redeemed? (1 Corinthians 15:22, 23).

4. There is also the concern that such bold strides in genetic engineering are motivated by a defiance of God.

Genesis 11:1-9 discusses what happens when the creation attempts to exalt itself above the Creator. The people in Genesis 11 were unified, yet they were not submissive to God’s design. As a result, God stopped their progress. God certainly recognized that there were some dangers involved with the direction in which the people were headed. We have a similar warning in Romans 1:18-32. There God describes individuals that have become so enamored with the creation (actually worshipping it rather than the Creator) that those individuals spiraled down to destruction. There is a danger that genetic engineering could foster similar motivations, and ultimately, similar results.

Retrieved from and modified in format 06/26/12

No comments:

Post a Comment